Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01511
Original file (PD2012 01511.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME:    CASE: PD1201511
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20130329
SEPARATION DATE: 20020620


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (37F20/Psychological Operations Specialist) medically separated for a bilateral knee condition. The CI injured his knees during a parachute jump early in training. He continued to suffer knee pain throughout completion of his training and the rest of his service career. He was diagnosed with bilateral chondromalacia patellae; and, in 2000, his symptoms steadily escalated. He did not respond adequately to treatment to meet the physical requirements of his MOS or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded the condition (bilateral chondromalcia patellae diagnosis) to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The IPEB adjudicated “bilateral chronic knee pain” as a single unfitting condition, rated 20% (10% each knee with bilateral factor (BF) included), IAW the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI withdrew an initial appeal for a Formal PEB (FPEB); and, was medically separated with a 20% disability rating.


CI CONTENTION: “I believe my rating is inaccurate because all of service connected injuries (i.e. Bilateral pes planus and plantar fasciitis (also claimed as right plantar fasciitis ), left post healed fibula fracture, concussion with residual of migraine - type headaches, and lumbosacral stain were not assessed. My physical rating was based solely on right and left patellofemoral pain syndrome with osteoarthritis.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44 (Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The rating for the unfitting knee condition(s) is addressed below. The requested bilateral foot, left leg, migraine and lumbar conditions were not identified by the PEB, and thus are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Those, and any other conditions or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the respective Service Board for Correction of Military Records.
RATING COMPARISON:

Service PEB – Dated 20011221
 VA - (~2 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Bilateral Knee Pain/Chondromalacia Patellae
(10% R + 10% L w/BLF)
 5099-5003 20% Right Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome wth Osteoarthritis (Originally Claimed as Chronic Bil Knee Condition) 5099-5003 10% 20020430
Left Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome with Osteoarthritis
and Status Post Healed Fibula Fracture (Originally
Claimed as Bilateral Knee Condition)		 5099-5003 10% 20020430
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 7 20020430
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 40%
VARD 20020625 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS] )

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Bilateral Chronic Knee Condition. The record indicates that the CI had pain in both knees that limited MOS performance. The CI was treated conservatively with minimal benefit. Orthopedic examination, 19 March 2001, revealed tenderness to palpation, no effusion, and a normal range-of-motion (ROM) in the left knee with slight reduction in the right knee (125 degrees). It was determined that he was not a surgical candidate. X-rays of both knees, in December 2000, showed degenerative changes with mild irregularity of the posterior patellar surface. Bone scan on 3 January 2001 was normal. The MEB examination 28 November 2001, approximately 7 months prior to separation, documented no instability, effusion and near normal full ROM. The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination, 30 April 2002, approximately 7 weeks prior to separation, the CI reported daily pain in both knees. The physical examination documented no instability and noted right flexion of 135 degrees and left of 140 degrees, not affected by pain, weakness, lack of endurance or incoordination. The PEB combined bilateral knee pain as a single unfitting condition coded analogously to 5003 and rated 20%. The Board noted the bilateral knee condition was combined, not bundled, and were given separate rating of 10% based on pain. The VA used the same code and rated each knee at 10%. The Board considered codes 5260, and 5258; however, since there was no evidence of knee locking, effusions, instability or decreased ROM, the Board unanimously agreed there were no other rating considerations. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the bilateral chronic knee condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the bilateral chronic knee pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Bilateral Chronic Knee Pain
 5099-5003 20%
COMBINED
 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120812, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




         Physical Disability Board of Review


 SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB),

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130009585 (PD201201511)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02551

    Original file (PD-2013-02551.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20050201VA –(1 Day Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain5099-50030%Patellofemoral Syndrome Left Knee5099-501410%20050317Patellofemoral Syndrome Right Knee5099-501410%20050317Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 2 Combined: 0%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050520 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). VA exam also documented crepitus (which is specified in §4.59) as well...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01629

    Original file (PD-2013-01629.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Patellofemoral Pain, Bilaterally… 5099-50030%Patellofemoral Syndrome…Left…525710%20050514Patellofemoral Syndrome…Right…52580%Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 4 Combined: 0%Combined: 10%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050608 ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The PEB combined the bilateral knee pain conditions as a single unfitting condition rated at 0%, coded 5099-5003 (analogous to degenerative arthritis).The PEB relied on AR 635.40...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00440

    Original file (PD-2012-00440.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON: Service FPEB – Dated 20090417 Condition Code Left Leg Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Right Leg Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Left Leg Chronic Compartment Syndrome Right Leg Chronic Compartment Syndrome Mild Exercise Induced Asthma Low Back Bilateral Pes Planus Bilateral Planter Fasciitis Atypical Non‐Cardiac Chest Pain 5099‐5003 Rating 10% 5099‐5003 10% 5099‐5003 5099‐5003 0% 0% Not Unfitting Not Unfitting Not Unfitting Not Unfitting Not Unfitting VA (2 Weeks Pre‐Separation)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 02245

    Original file (PD 2014 02245.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition, characterized as “left knee pain with chondromalacia patella” by the MEB, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.Although the final PEB diagnosis was persistent knee pain “due to Patellofemoral Syndrome” and the MEB diagnosis was due to “chondromalacia patella,” the NARSUM diagnosis was due to “subluxation.” Radiographs indicated degenerative changes...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01952

    Original file (PD2012 01952.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated chronic bilateral knee pain as unfitting, rated 10%citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain Condition . SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130018485 (PD201201952)I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00887

    Original file (PD 2012 00887.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20060409 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic LBP 5299-5242 0% DDD Lumbosacral Spine 5243 40% 20070122 Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain 5099-5003 0% S/P Arthroscopic Repair of Medial Meniscal Tear Right Knee w/ Traumatic DJD 5260-5010 10% 20070124 Left Knee Injury 5260 NSC* 20070122 No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Other x 13 20070122 Combined: 0% Combined: 70% Derived from VA Rating Decision 20070308 (most proximate from the date of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00394

    Original file (PD2009-00394.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI requested reconsideration and the Informal PEB then determined he was unfit for continued Naval service and he was separated with 10% disability for bilateral hip dysplasia with the following related (Category II) conditions: mild chondromalacia patella in the left knee; polyarthralgias; osteoarthritis of the knees bilaterally with specifically chondral degeneration of the patellofemoral joint; and severe chondromalacia patella and bipolar lesions in the right knee with instability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00908

    Original file (PD2011-00908.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the DES considers all of the service member's medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short the member’s service career; and the Board’s assessment of fitness determinations is premised on the MOS-specific functional limitations in evidence at the time of separation. Bilateral Knee Condition . RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00017

    Original file (PD2010-00017.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the left patellofemoral arthritis condition as unfitting, rated 10%; additionally left open patella fracture condition was considered category II, a related condition that is not separately unfitting; with application of SECNAVINST 1850.4E respectively. Service Treatment Record In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandum, approve the recommendations of the PDBR the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00726

    Original file (PD2011-00726.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : The CI states: “MEB and PEB only looked at Patellofemoral Syndrome for 1 knee. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination completed in April 2005 noted a long history of bilateral patellofemoral syndrome that had not resolved with bilateral physical therapy, bilateral Synvisc injections, limited duty for bilateral knees, and right knee surgical lateral release and synovitis debridement. The VA C&P examination did measure the ROM of the left knee and it was normal.